In our grief stricken panic and fear, we had to somehow retrieve the body of our daughter from the authorities, that we may bring her ashes with us. At the same time, now the pressure was truly accelerated to GET OUT OF COSTA RICA. Simultaneously we could not be seen around town as state authorities were searching for us under false pretenses. Under this extreme duress, we saw no choice but to accept the assistance of a friend who was a lawyer so that we could find a way to get Nikoline's body back in our possession and arrange a service for her. An officer of the court was the only persona the court, PANI, or other public servants were willing to speak with; someone of similar cloth; a player on their jurisdictional board.
Our friend Gustavo suggested he could go speak with Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda and PANI attorney PATRICIA MESEN ARROYO to assess their attitudes, that we may act accordingly. They asked Gustavo where we were hiding and he did not divulge that info. The conversation did reveal (FINALLY) a few words of open dialogue which they had refused us. PANI attorney PATRICIA MESEN ARROYO lamented the fact that she wished that 'the family just leave their geographical jurisdiction.' Being a bully is only fun until someone gets hurt or killed. PATRICIA MESEN ARROYO continued with an absolutely bone chilling comment; "We would CONSIDER allowing the grandmother of the children to take legal charge of the children pending that, A) the grandmother can PROVE that she is not of the SAME RELIGIOUS PERSUASION AS THE CHILDRENS' PARENTS." B) that the children receive their free entitlement vaccines.
This is a statement which is so legally illiterate that it left us speechless with incredulity. We do NOT practice religion of any kind. We are practicing the law which the judge and all of these demented bureaucrats took an oath to uphold. It is not our law we are abiding by; IT IS THEIRS.
These people do not have the intellectual logic to understand their own law, its history and foundation and their adherence via contractual oaths with which the people confer the power the judge wields. This same lack of logic is evidenced by their refusing to speak with us, face us in court, or even provide discovery, which is a requirement of a civil matter.
Ironically, as most people consider empathy born out of emotion, it is in fact, in the highest sense, a sixth sense available to those who can practice solving problems using exceptional logic. It is now easy to see why these people cannot see the obvious crime they are committing because they lack the intellectual logic to understand the source of the power entrusted to them.
Patricia Mesen Arroyo made her offer to us under the obtuse pretense that she somehow had control over my children. Since possession is 9/10 of the law and a uniform commercial civil claims the 1/10 required to actually have any lawful or legal control over my children, Patricia Mesen Arroyo made an offer in assumpsit. She neither had a claim nor possession. Observing all her errors in law, lying on affidavits, refusing discovery, refusing to talk, rebut affidavits, etc., one can begin to determine that there is something not quite right about Patricia Mesen Arroyo's mental health. In essence, what Patricia Mesen Arroyo was offering us was to cease and desist terrorizing our family IF we submitted to her control. These are the same kind of offers made by gangs in the protection racket. Submit to the gang's control and they won't damage your property or family. There is an elemental legal problem with Patricia Mesen Arroyo's offer; there is no substance to her offer of which we can consider. IE that what she offers, we already have. You see, the children are in our custody and as we produced the children and birthed them at home, my wife and I also possess the 10/10 of the law; the only registration of their births. It is ironic they could not find this in our house, but of course it was located in a Bible. Not likely the judge would have thought of that, seeing he has absolutely no intent to submit to his oath nor the preamble and through a semantic failure does not know what the etymological definition or religion is. Thus, Patricia Mesen Arroyo's offer is no offer at all and is nothing more than the criminal use of threats and coercion. Of course she does not see this because her legal illiteracy has left her bereft of logic and suspended her in a narcissistic control syndrome. She now must protect her persona and her position which now are making her decisions and statements appear completely psychotic due to their lack of grasp on the basic construct of law which most people would call common sense.
Offer: I will let you keep your car if you let me control its use. Only a narcissist or complete idiot could make such an offer. Either way, they have mal intent.
Upon further discussion in the meeting with PANI attorney, Patricia Mesen Arroyo, and Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda, our counsel was able to get critical comments from Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda. The judge told Gustavo that he felt my wife was 'mocking his authority.'
Now that is quite a statement that requires serious scrutiny. First we must define 'mock' in the sense of 'deride.' No where in there does it describe us or the actions of my wife.
On September 6, 2011, Birgitte entered the court in Puriscal, Costa Rica and identified herself as the individual who the Ministry of Health and PANI sought and accosted. She had two witnesses who could confirm she was in the court and the affiant, Dr. Juan Miguel Chacon Cerdas, who desired Birgitte's signature to enter an agreement. If there was a mockery of an actual Costa Rican article 35 court, it was the through the malicious bias engaged in by Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda in attempt to aid the United Nations through PANI. These entities are subcontracted under article 7 and established to write civil rules for citizens, residents and other consensual contractees registered with the Costa Rican government. Instead of honorably greeting 'the woman' who claimed to be Birgitte Poulsen, he simply wrote a statement that she did not show up.
And why were you cowering, unwilling to see an unregistered individual under the capacity of the preamble which you have taken an oath to uphold, Carlos?
The fact that he says she was 'mocking' him admits that she was indeed in the court to answer to any complaint. That he was having his authority checked in regards to a private tribunal vs. a public court of record left him in an outrage because, like Patricia Mesen Arroyo and these other narcissists, they desire to be in control of that which requires our consent. The fact that 99.9% of the population give the consent does not force us to associate. Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda made a mockery of the very sanctity of the oath of office he took in order to sit as an officer and fiducial trust of that court.
As the court refused to listen to my wife in the flesh, we were thrust into a state of duress and after the death of our daughter, we had no choice but to associate with a licensed court officer in spite of the fact that he could potentially attorn our status. When this licensed attorney, Gustavo, returned from his reconiassance, the gut wrenching reality was clear to all present; there was no way we could risk exposing our family at our daughter's funeral service we had arranged with our friends and family in Barbacoas. These public servants, autonomous NGO (PANI) and their accomplice, Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda were critically unstable due to their pressing need to contain the backlash from this treasonous and lawless action which killed my daughter and destroyed our family. We could not chance any exposure to such desperate individuals.
Upon learning of the defensive state of mind the judge and PANI attorney were in, we had no choice but to reformat our goals and simplify them to: retrieving our daughter's body and cremating it, arranging a service in her honor for the benefit of our town friends and finally, getting beyond the reach of these treasonous criminals masquerading as public servants. We needed time to be unmolested, so a notice was drafted and delivered by our counsel, Gustavo. The intent of the letter was not defensive, because this would simply increase the already heightened levels of fear in the minds of the public servants. Instead, a letter was drafted which postulated a submissive posture. (A prime reason why we would never hire a lawyer in constitutional affairs.) Gustavo drafted a notice requesting a future hearing based upon an inferior defense platform that assumed the judge jurisdictional affirmation.
Our goal to buy time required that we reduce the judge's cognitive dissonance and primitive self preservation reflex. By introducing a failing defense platform in the notice, we were able to increase the judge's self esteem and social validation so that the judge felt he was in control once again. The judge granted a two week suspension of action leading to a hearing. In a world where physical outcomes are predicated upon words, it behooves one to use the same linguistic doping used by the levitical alchemists themselves. The following post will examine that notice to the court.
Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda had no possible way to force us into a contract according to his oath, YET continued to terrorize us using the state police. He refused to address my wife in the court on September 6, 2011 in Puriscal, Costa Rica, but proceeded to break the law and chase us into exile with armed force. The reason he could not adjudicate was that the affiant, PANI, could not establish civil jurisdiction and since there were no criminal charges, there was actually no judicial capacity for the judge to opine on anything. That is the reason we were encouraged, continuously, to use an attorney to retrieve documents and make pleadings. It is a simple reason. The use of an attorney establishes the jurisdiction of the court because we voluntarily take a state benefit through the bureau that licenses the attorneys. In essence, when you use an attorney to make a defense based upon the preamble, you declare yourself incompetent and become a ward of the state. That declaration is made by your own consent to use an attorney or accept an attorney by state appointment. That is, of course, why we made the declaration that we did not consent to the use of an attorney. We did not need legal advice. It was the affiant who needed to establish jurisdiction without the judge aiding them with false testimonies and threats.
As such, our use of an Attorney (Gustavo) was for one purpose only: To get the judge to back down by asking for a new hearing. Of course, asking for a hearing alone confers a state benefit which would establish a nexus whereby jurisdictional elements would be met. (That is why we NEVER ask the state for anything. It can be considered a benefit and the judge can establish a quasi contract.) In essence, to be players on their jurisdictional board, we must consent or take a benefit. Lack of the acceptance of any such benefit is why the judge could not see Birgitte on September 6, 2011. His subsequent actions and warrants were illegal by his own rules and protocols.
SO, the document that was drafted was built with losing arguments so that the judge, with hope he could contain the mess he made, would grant us reprieve from the misguided force. It goes without saying that this document, along with the assistance by which it was created, was signed under duress.
The illusion of surrender with those losing arguments were:
A) Located in parts 1-3 was the submissive recognition of the judge's authority over us.
B) That not vaccinating our children were laws written by us.
C) That we ask for a state benefit (a new hearing by which the judge can establish a quasi contract.)
D) That we did not previously use a lawyer and as such did not argue properly.
E) That these beliefs surrounding education and health cradle OUR beliefs, and that those beliefs differ from the state's, when in fact they are the state's beliefs. Our beliefs are irrelevant. We understand Law and follow it. They are laws established and protected by the preamble and the judicial oath. We did not write these laws; we did not write the constitution; and we did not take an oath to protect these scriptural laws. Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda took that oath in order that he may wield state force. It is Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda's duty as a trustee to protect any people wishing to exercise these laws.
F)That due to the religious latitude in first world countries our ability to choose should be considered. In fact, by law, if we have consented to the state in any way, the judge can then opine on the matter. Thus any facts surrounding the logic can be overturned by judicial opinion.
G) That the obligatory nature of the vaccines leans on public opinion and education. In fact the obligatory nature of any law rests purely on defining the law of obligations and its four elements. That is why the legislature found back with amendment 2000-11648 that there was no article 28 issue regarding the people's free will being infringed, because the vinculum was satisfied by registration. The people already gave their consent, like it or not. Obligations are not subject to opinion, they are consecrated by commercial law contracts.
H) That the obligatory nature of the vaccines may weigh more heavily in favor of the community during emergency measures (like H1N1 for example), where in reality the community and its well being has no bearing on an obligation. This argument enters into the herd immunity principle and is easily debunked. Our being vaccinated or not does not interfere with anyone's decision to receive what ever medication you desire or are obligated to receive.
This inferior platform was established in order to stroke the judge's ego and improve his self esteem and social validation. We intended for this notice to help pause the terrorizing pursuit we were subjected to. There is no winning anything with narcissists who needed to cover their treason. We were forced under duress to use an attorney who entered a losing argument just to get sufficient relief that we may retrieve our daughter's body and escape.
The final points of law (13-17) will be examined next.
The pressing need to create a notice to the court so that Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda could see a proper manner to assist the affiant in establishing jurisdiction just so they would stop terrorizing for sufficient time to deal with our daughter's funeral was a nauseating tactic. Never the less, I did not want to change our true standing in the court, thus I followed Gustavo's work with actual points of law, although couched in language which softened their real nature.
13) That the children have no rights except those bestowed upon them by their guardians.
The simple reason is that all rights must be articulated by the combatant defendant in persona propria. If you cannot identify and articulate your rights, they can be taken from you. Therefore, if you willingly waive your fundamental rights as the purveyors of human life to a dead civil entity, such as government via the 14th amendment (US) or article 13.3 of the Costa Rican constitution, you no longer can apply the preambular laws regarding raising your children. By your own hand or mouth, you have transferred their lives to the state and reduced your status to that of the babysitter. As such, the registered child is subject to whatever opinions and interpretations the judiciary on that jurisdictional playing surface makes.
However, in our case, we did not transfer any rights to the state. Our allodial right over our children is protected by the prerequisite ideal enumerated in the preamble. The state cannot prove possession, civil claim (registration) nor allodial right to our DNA. In essence, the state has absolutely no power over our children, United Nations or not.
The principle bears repeating, because people complain about government, but do not understand where they became subject to rules they do not agree with or that are inconsistent with common sense or basic morality. This confusion is fostered in both churches and courts and the hidden hand behind the idol does not want people understanding that the power people have over themselves and their progeny has been abandoned voluntarily. There is no law stating you must have a cedula in Costa Rica or a social security number in the United States.
The concept of 'minors' is born out of minority and is a status applied and regulated by the state. Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda continuously speaks of my children as state assets by defining them as minors. This status requires verification from a combatant claimant (plaintiff) in order to establish the jurisdiction. Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda is operating in assumpsit when he claims this status has been proven. He is operating in treason when he is shown such status does not exist and he proceeds, in any case, to assist the will of an NGO (United Nations).
