At this point Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda modifies the original complaint claiming that education is also being withheld from our children. This is not part of the original complaint made by the Ministry of Health. This is a small enhancement targeted at the people he attempting to deceive with this writ. This writ is only a suggestion because he is not authorized by constitutional law to apply for a search warrant. He can merely authorize a properly established application. He could create a bench warrant, but that would destroy his goal because the police would pick up my wife and return to the court where she was just denied a hearing and dismissed; except this time we would have had police officers, who we know, as witnesses. This would prove not only embarrassing to the judge but establish the requirements for charges of judicial harassment, amongst others.
Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda states in this hybrid warrant he is creating, that our religion precludes the children from receiving health care or education, yet he has NO probable cause for such. We have proven that we have no obligation to the state. Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda does not have any probable cause (of our abusing our children due to lack of education or health maintenance) which is a requirement for a search warrant, nor does he state which religious cult we belong to that mandates such evil practices. These are more non sequitors for those receiving this notice as an alleged authorization to engage in a criminal action.
Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda is now not only representing the affiant, who has neither probable cause nor civil nexus, but he is in violation of the search warrant process, as well as article 23. He is working FOR the United Nations, not the sovereign defended by article 2 in the constitution. The United Nations is a civil entity, like Kmart or McDonalds or vaccine manufacturers. They all have their internal codes, statutes and unlimited ability to contract with anyone including governments.
In his attempt to justify the actions he is about to engage in during the next hour on September 6, 2011, Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda creates a classic use of legalese to confuse and muddle the minds of those who are to receive this suggestion of a search warrant. It is a suggestion, because the judge has lost his judicial competency since, according to under article 23 as a prevention of judicial bias, and he cannot team with the affiant as a prevention of judicial bias. Judicial bias is checked by proper procedure and protocol which lapsed an hour earlier when the judge dismissed my wife without allowing her to enter the hearing he called, never without personally determining her relationship with the affiant.
Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda's next claim contains 436 words, 39 commas and 14 separate legal precepts in a single sentence. This incantation is an attempt to confuse the recipient of this notice (the police) into believing that 0x0x0x0= an insurmountable pile of evidence, when in fact, it remains 0. It is a single affidavit and complaint made by a judge who is acting as a plaintiff for the United Nations. That alone precludes his ability to authorize any search warrant, let alone one he manufactures out of narcissistic rage. As such, what is required is police or prosecutor protocols to first apply for a search warrant using this info as the probable cause. It would have to go to a competent judge who again would make the same determination as was made July 26. This is a civil complaint and the evidence of the contract is still pending as a point made by the defendant. Bring the contract, adhesion or otherwise, and we can then proceed with the claim. In fact, each of the non sequitors and false claims we are going to examine in Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda's testimony prove they have nothing, but and empty handed they have already begun the process of defending themselves before they lay waste to my family.
We shall examine this masterpiece of legal alchemy made by wordsmith Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda next in the coming posts.
Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda's 430 word sentence includes the following 14 principles:
1) The judge questions if it is viable to give more time for 'the lady' to voluntarily proceed to vaccinate. Time, an element in contract law, as well as any obligation to vaccinate is established under the law of obligations.
2) The fact that the judge notes that she has not volunteered to choose vaccinate acknowledges the civil principles of the law of obligations: Once volunteered, the obligation takes effect.
3) The judge notes that 'the lady' has delayed the process in a prudent manner yet makes no attempt to rebut that prudent manner and once again cites months of time in wait for a voluntary action. This reference to time negates the concept of 'exigent' search warrant status as obviously there is no life or death status witnessed by the fact that they would have broken down our gate on July 26, 2011 which they refrained from due to the consent required under civil search rules.
4) In defense of his decision to apply for and authorize a new search warrant, as the old one expired at 6 PM on July 26, 2011, the judge suggests that his actions are not arbitrary. This would be obvious if protocol is followed so why suggest it? Of course, proper protocol with any new search warrant would require probable cause of a felonious action. Not volunteering to obligate yourself is not a felony.
5) The judge implies that if 'the lady' had not volunteered in the time given a process would be set in motion, which again suggests is beyond his control.
6) That as the time elapses, the ability to locate the children diminishes. This implies that there is some criminal action afoot. Thus any action of movement with our children at this point is assumed to be evasive even though no due process has been followed.
7) The judge claims that 'the lady' is separating the children from PANI and the Ministry of Health from their assignment of administering the obligatory entitlements.
8) The judge claims that the mother does not take care of the children's health needs because we seek to not subscribe to pharmaceutical vaccines as an intelligent, proper health requisite.
9) The judge notes that the children are at risk of getting deadly diseases (chicken pox, measles, whooping cough, polio, tetanus) infers that the judge (self imposed prosecutor) is prepared to prove that claim as a fact both scientifically and statistically and that there are not other remedies and preventative measures that are not more effective. Further to this that his apparent statement of fact lacks any proof of a criminal activity or civil breach and further that the risk assessment has been voluntarily given to the state via registration for said entitlements. Without the registration, the prosecutor's (judge's) claim remains opinion, lacking jurisdiction.
10) He suggests that 'the lady' is not actually the mother and that these children maybe illegitimately in her charge,. This is, of course is a serious matter and an issue that was never ascribed in the original charge, but now that the new affiant, Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda makes the claim that 'the lady' is not the mother puts the burden of proof of that charge squarely on Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda.
11) The judge observes that 'the lady' is aloof regarding state identification of the children which is somehow unlawful. In fact we made very clear, in the "prudent manner" noted by the judge, that the children are NOT registered accordingly as per 13.3 of the constitution.
12) That 'the lady' has not given any documentation describing her legal status in the country which is a)incorrect as we entered into the court a document that described in great detail our position regarding our status as well as our INTENT, and b) irrelevant to the subject matter originally presented by the ministry of health compliant regarding vaccines.
13) The judge infers that this migratory status burdens the children because our status is a requisite to the obligatory nature of the vaccines (cannot disagree with that). Here he admits there is an obstacle of jurisdiction.
14) That the obligatory vaccines govern the Costa Rican State. When in fact the constitution governs the Costa Rican state and the vaccine/health statutes govern those who subscribe to those entitlements.
That we are negating the entitlemens by way of using a constitutional imposition. (cannot disagree with that, but somehow inferring this is wrong.)
There is more to this search warrant application/justification, but these points were included in a single sentence which required deconstruction for clarity.
Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda continues his diatribe against his own governing document that he has pledged an oath to uphold in quoting a section of the opinions made by the interamerican court suggesting that the family does not have the arbitrary right to put their children in danger or risk. This entire document, if not taken out of context, is a dissertation on the separation of children from their parents and is useful in understanding the intent of the judge when he describes the objective and mission of PANI.
One must read the entirety of the document to see the objectives found on page 4 where the 5 points (a-e) regarding the separation, and the LIMITATION of children's liberty in order to enforce the rights (entitlements). Judge Oliver Jackman, (scroll down to page 89 to read in English) presiding on this issue, has dissenting views. Important to note through all of this is that these are judicial opinions and are only subject to those who have subjected themselves voluntarily through registration. If no obligation can be proven via the law of obligations, then the opinion remains opinion and cannot be used on individual's standing under law in a civil process. It is unusual to find somebody with no registration and no evidence of a civil vinculum whereby the judge COULD extend a quasi contract in order to enforce an obligation. We have gone to great extent and inconvenience to live in a manner that neither offends the entity the judge pledges allegiance to in the preamble as well as maintaining no vinculum to any civil obligations that would offend the government.
The only lawful choice available to the judge is to uphold his oath fiducial obligation to the sovereign and send this matter back to the Ministry of Health for lack of sufficient cause due to lack of vinculum (law of obligations). However, the judge has decided to ignore that oath and take sides with the United Nations. Now, to succeed in his quest to fulfill the mission of PANI, he must divide and conquer my family in order to quell our ability to respond freely. That will require force and lacking justification, some judicial fabrication and hypnotic alchemy is required in order to cast a spell over the police. "Words are the most powerful drugs used by mankind."- Rudyard Kipling
As Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda has nothing of any civil substance to offer in his civil complaint, he must play his final heavy weight cards. He claims to the recipient of this application, that Birgitte did not attend to the judges call to the court on September 6, 2011. He is actually claiming this to the police that she did not attend to the call of the judge. Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda is telling the police that Birgitte Poulsen did not show up to court which allows the judge to issue a bench warrant, not issue a cart blanche, ex parte, search warrant including child confiscation ambitions. He also claims that we have not established our condition in the country. Of course, the police would not have any knowledge that, indeed, we entered a very full and detailed report about our status in the country directly to the court prior to September 6, 2011. So now we are dealing in fabrications on top of the fabrications. That we have ignored their requests to respond with vaccine information is completely false as per all of the affidavits, refusing to make contact with Birgitte until she made a motion of intent to diminish her rights via captious diminutio maxima.
In fact, it is they who in every instance ignored us and refused to respond even to the judge refusing to see Birgitte as she awaited him in the flesh with her accusers and those threatening her family in the same room. What is wrong with this picture? They were not threatening a state artificial persona called BIRGITTE POULSEN, an entity of their creation. They were threatening Birgitte Poulsen in the flesh and that is who was standing before them prepared to establish a show cause hearing. Finally, after all the ignorant harassment, threats, coercion and insolent behavior of state servants claiming they need not speak with us, why can they not engage with her in front of her witnesses in a proper article 35 court of law? The reason is simple, because she would win, and they know it. If the judge was to emerge and my wife established her standing with him as a witness, his capacity to sustain a private tribunal would be decapitated. That's why he hid from her.
In his final statement, judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda orders ex-processo re-instatement of the original civil search of July 26, 2011, except this one is enhanced with fabricated resolutions and perjury. Nothing has actually changed in any standing since the 26, except for the accused being asked to leave the court house. Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda has added to the original application the "unavoidable" vaccination of our children as well as the sequestering of documents, registration of the children and use of 'whatever measures are necessary if the parents attempt to defend the children. Such will be carried out by the OIJ (national police) complimented with Ministry of Health and PANI to assist.'
With ex parte hybrid warrant in hand and the police sufficiently convinced to break in to our private domicile, Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda, Dr. Cerdas, Patricia Mesen Arroyo, PANI psychologists, along with a bridade of National Police, the excitement and intoxicating rush of the fox hunt begins. The Judge's comments and resolution after he excused my wife from the court were made at 1:00PM. By 1:20 PM he was writing his 'act of break and entry' disguised as a search warrant maxed out to include anything his magic pen requests.
The necessity for expediency and stealth was evident as is was imperative that our ability to respond to this attack freely and publicly had to be eliminated. For if this case file was ever made public, the breaches of protocols, etc., would prove more than embarrassing. This, capture was imperative and with his order to do "whatever was necessary" if we defended our children, would guarantee arrests followed by a maritime salvage of 'abandoned children.'
If judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda was successful with his ambition, we would be absolutely without a voice.
As experience has taught me, I listened to my instinct that told me to remove our children from our house during the time my wife attended the court. My wife called me from the court house after she was told 'the judge would get back to her.' I remained skeptical, as this entire scenario was inconsistent with law. Thus, we remained out of reach until the court proved intent to act as the trustees of constitutional law they have pledged an oath to. My wife returned home and shortly thereafter, Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda and his brigade broke the lock on our gate and entered our domicile without notice or our consent. My wife, fearing the inconsistency and reality of the intent of a lawless home invasion, fled the scene. She had honored the court's request and with full and complete knowledge of the affiant's lack of a civil or criminal claim, the judge dishonored his fiducial duty as a trustee for the people of Costa Rica and indulged in a fit of narcissistic rage.
We will detail the fruit of the poisonous tree which they stole from our house in the next post, but more importantly, Judge Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda FAILED in his assignment to make physical contact with my children in an admiralty civil salvage claim on abandoned children. This action was a critical risk that Carlos Manuel Sanchez Miranda took in assessing his strategy of how to best serve the interests of the United Nations. He failed in his task which was poorly thought out as, although he was obedient to his masters (United Nations) he was short sighted in areas of self preservation. Nevertheless, he and his cohorts succeeded in achieving the terrorism required to send our family fleeing for safety, security and a new sanctuary.
I cannot imagine what was going through the judge's mind as he left my house with the knowledge that this problem was not sealed off. In strategic word; he missed his mark, leaving his actions and lawless breach of trust potentially exposed. More on the activities of trashing my home and stealing our property coming up next.
