3/31/12 The War Against the Family


As we merge back into the case file, we find complaints, but no actual charges. The PANI (child protection agency in Costa Rica) has no ability to make a charge as there is neither a civil (contractual,) nor a criminal basis for a charge. However, they do make their desires well known to the United Nations tribunal headed by the Judge.

Costa Rica, under article 7 of the constitution, can make treaties and otherwise convert any social policy to the control of an outside entity. Such was done by the creation of PANI which is an autonomous industry which article 55 has its internal policies driven by the United Nations and backed up by ministries of the Costa Rican government.

But what could possibly be wrong with such a holy, world governing, philanthropic organization that is so concerned about impressing its ideals on nations worldwide? The United Nation's power is founded in contracting with bureaucracies of those nations in order to follow the dogmas promoted by the United Nations. Without further belaboring the legal mechanics, lets have a look at the fundamental thinking that drives this international governing body.

George Brock Chisholm (1896-1971,) head of the World Health Organization, Psychiatry (1946) describes what must occur:

"To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas...The reinterpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of the old people, these are the belated objectives...for charting the changes in human behavior."

Here is another link which illustrates the philosophies that mold United Nations.

One goal is to eliminate children's dependence on parents in favor of dependence on the state (or the elite that run the state.) The following link does not necessarily share the same religious philosophy as me, but his research on United Nations engineers is worth observing.

'Every Child is OUR Child' Observe the exploitable hubris of the international youth involved in this United Nations sect. This is a group of young malleable minds at the hands of sophisticated adepts claiming 'every child is our child.' This is reminiscent of Hitler youth movement of the 1930's. Who in their right mind could even think that, let alone kick in people's doors and steal their children, force chemicals into them and place them in state coerced mind warping centers for the recruitment of more system soldiers. This is not conspiracy theory, this happened, to us.

Marta Santos Pais, Unicef Director, claims that the unregistered child is 'marginalized.' The question is, marginalized by whom? When the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 7 says, "The child shall be registered immediately after birth and shall have the right from birth to a name, the right to acquire a nationality and as far as possible, the right to know and be cared for by his or her parents."


"...AS FAR AS POSSIBLE the right to know and be cared by his or her parents." Just what and who determines this?

The people who believe we must be our brother's keepers over and above his objection are a mutual admiration cult that reaks of psychotic idiocy.

Whether an individual favors the United Nations philosophies or not is up to the individual, but it is always notable that any such religion or philosophical body that insists everyone must participate or it will not work, is indicative of Totalitarianism.

The bureaucrats that hatched the United Nations are determined to take control of my children. However, I decline the United Nations and their various appendages' offers of health and education. Any refusal by the United Nations and their appendages to acknowledge by declination and jurisdictional objection is simply an action by a group of self appointed men deciding to steal what they have no claim on. If the United Nations tribunal believes their religion is so fantastic that they being our zoo keepers is nonnegotiable, then they are simply thugs masquerading as law.

I have no contracts with the United Nations, nor do I have contracts with the state of Costa Rica. To be forced to practice United Nations Humanist religious principles is in violation of their own charter. Just as it is a violation of the Costa Rican constitution.

None of these Humanist public servants have proven their jurisdiction over my children. The most proactive validation they came up with was, "We do not have to answer to you." Remember the words of Dr. Cerdas in the You Tube video, "Para servile." What insolence.

No comments:

Post a Comment